FloresAI AI Governance & Compliance
NIST AI RMF · ISO/IEC 42001 · CMMC · TRAIGA

A defensible AI program — evidence, not a policy on a shelf

Enterprise security questionnaires, defense compliance boundaries, and examiner questions about AI don't accept "we're careful." We build the governance program, and the evidence, that answers them.

Book a scoping call
Who this is for

Organizations that have to show their work

  • SaaS and software companies facing AI questions in enterprise security questionnaires and audits
  • Defense contractors assessing AI use within CMMC / NIST 800-171 boundaries
  • Financial institutions answering examiner questions on AI and model risk
  • Organizations aligning to NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, or Texas TRAIGA

Three engagements, each credits toward the next

Start with a scored assessment. Move into a full program build only if it makes sense. Keep it current with fractional leadership once it's live.

Engagement 1

AI Governance Readiness Assessment

A scored, board-ready picture of your AI exposure against the framework that applies to you.

  • AI system & footprint inventory, including shadow AI
  • Gap assessment vs. NIST AI RMF / ISO/IEC 42001 / applicable law
  • Risk register, prioritized
  • Prioritized roadmap + executive readout

Fixed-scope · credits 100% toward the Program Build

Engagement 2

Governance Program Build

The complete program: policies, inventory, controls, and the evidence to back them up.

  • Policies & an AI inventory / AI Bill of Materials
  • Control implementation mapped to your framework
  • Incident-response procedure for AI systems
  • Evaluation / red-team harness & evidence collection cadences

Fixed-scope

Engagement 3

Fractional AI Governance Lead

Ongoing leadership that keeps the program current instead of stale.

  • Quarterly assessments
  • Model-change reviews
  • Audit support
  • Continuous monitoring

Retainer

Why FloresAI

I operate a governed multi-tenant AI platform in production: policy-gated autonomy, a validated prompt-injection firewall, and tamper-evident (WORM) audit logging. Clients get working evidence, not templates.

CISSP, CCSP, AAISM, Azure AI & Security Engineer Associate · 8+ years FedRAMP/federal GRC

Where TRAIGA fits

Texas's TRAIGA names NIST AI RMF alignment as a statutory safe harbor. We build governance programs on that framework, so alignment work already produces the safe-harbor evidence if TRAIGA applies to you — not a separate compliance project bolted on afterward.

Also offering Governed Intake — a governed AI receptionist for law and CPA firms. See Governed Intake.